>relays are inherently public Relays are a machine, an ip, a server, with a public relay descriptor.
You ISP has a similar descriptor for your CPE connected to their infrastructure. So the ip you use is public without precaution. Does that automatically make the association of you with that ip an enforced public policy. Maybe for your ISP or government. Not on tor network. If you really want to single out operator, or researcher, for missing some non-mandatory data, like some tor nanny, you better be prepared for consequences. Here I thought the policy was to create advocates not enemies. All I'm saying is if a researcher at a university registers some relay without contact that doesn't make them suspect. Get some proof then the discussion is a moot-point. Just because some past event happened (US-CERT, Black Hat Conference) doesn't give you the right to force disclosure. Don't play coy. Forcing disclosure is exactly what happened. Don't post some blog entry about being against harassment then stalk or harass a researcher for not being proactive to your comfort level. You should be grateful for their work, not self-righteous. What the hell do you think? The university pays for the relays and doesn't have a code of conduct for student activity using university resource? That code of conduct somehow doesn't apply to this graduate or their mentor? Exactly how much work have you done with a university because it sounds like none. That's my 2c. --leeroy -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk