IBM also develops surveilance hardware for oppressive regimes, no surprise they are against free speech and democracy. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/eff-files-amicus-brief-case-seeks-hold-ibm-responsible-facilitating-apartheid
Anders Andersson wrote: > I couldn't find what they mean with "the Netherlands is home to the > largest number of non-malicious and malicious nodes combined" in > Figure 1 on page 8. What differentiate a "malicious node" from a > "non-malicious node"? > > Otherwise it wasn't that bad, but the last paragraph is quite offensive: > > "In general, networks should be configured to deny access to websites > such as www.torproject.org" > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:51 AM, grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/wg/en/wgl03086usen/WGL03086USEN.PDF >> >> IBM Advises Businesses To Block Tor >> >> With Tor-based attacks on the rise, IBM says it's time to stop Tor in >> the enterprise. >> >> New data from IBM's X-Force research team shows steady increase in SQL >> injection and distributed denial-of-service attacks as well as >> vulnerability reconnaissance activity via the Tor anonymizing service. >> -- >> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk