Heyo, those organizations are surely doing crawling directly on the Tor Hidden Service, but it's also possible that they are doing it from Tor2web.
Also the German agency wrote sometime to abuse@, while the italian rely on national DNS-based censorship for CP sites (but have no evidence that they are doing it on tor2web.org). Btw i think that we shall start by asking ourself: "How can we detect that someone is doing a crawling without much false positive?" If we can do that, we would be able not only to remove them out from the statistics, but also to "Automatically act" on the crawlers. What do you think? On 10/25/15 4:13 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote: > I've been trying to get a better count of the popularity of child abuse > content. We know (or at the very least, strongly suspect), a lot of the > traffic comes from LEOs. Do we know of any organizations that are doing > this crawling? Both the IWF.org.uk <http://IWF.org.uk> as well as > NCMEC.org deny any crawling on their part. > > I'd like to talk to an organization that does some of this crawling and > their IPranges so we can subtract them out from the statistics. > > -V > > > _______________________________________________ > Tor2web-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/tor2web-talk > -- Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) HERMES - Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights http://logioshermes.org - https://globaleaks.org - https://tor2web.org - https://ahmia.fi _______________________________________________ Tor2web-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/tor2web-talk
