Hello Henning,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
henning 2004/09/06 04:20:12
Another of the "huh, how could this ever work?" bugs. Deleting an object
containing a timestamp didn't work, because the PostgreSQL adapter was
missing a method to convert the timestamp to the postgres format. So the
default [ts: <java.util.Date>] text was used, which (of course) returned
an error from the JDBC driver.
Probably selecting and updating didn't work, either. Well, timestamps don't
seem to be much in use these days. ;-)
They are in our application! (Every table has a timestamp so I can determine whether a record has been modified in the meantime in another session.) - I ran into exactly that problem and had to fudge my own solution using the PK for delete and update ;-)
Speaking of delete + update: it really bugs the hell out of me that there is no feedback whether the record has been updated/deleted. Any chance that could be implemented for 3.2?
--
Regards/Gruß,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
