Jonathan,
Thanks for your changes, I Hope I will have time to look at them soon and
commit them.
Jonathan Purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 22.06.2005 06:07:14:
> Thomas Fischer wrote:
> > In my opinion, it is a good idea to put the base packages into a
> > subdirectory. However, I am not so sure about backwards compatibility
> > there. Probably one would want to make this configurable (preferably
via a
> > configurable package suffix)
>
> Yes, we added an "extensionPackage" field for the classes that extend
> the base classes, so our database tag has these fields:
> package="project.db.generated"
> extensionPackage="project.db"
I would rather configure this in the build.properties of the generator than
in the database dtd. There, similare features are already configured. But
it should be no problem to change that.
Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
