> The vote has passed.
This is a shame. And I think the wrong decision has been made. Honestly. First and most importantly JIRA is not opensource. This should be a a considerable concern for open source developers. Second, scarab uses torque. Projects should "eat-their-own-dogfood". Third, is that Scarab IMHO is more advanced than JIRA. At work we are considering moving from JIRA to Scarab, even though we have paid (the very expensive, $10,000) license, simply because Scarab offers more than JIRA can. JIRA is bugzilla all over again forcing you into there way of doing things. Scarab let's you *really* design your own workflow. I've been using JIRA that last month and have been vastly dissappointed. Very restrictive issue heirarchy to start with! BUT this comparison is against Scarab's trunk, it would not be true against the last beta version even. The scarab version you guys have been using I would not even recognise anymore, so much has changed. Lack of momentum I don't think so. Check out the nightly test installation if you don't believe me. Scarab's performance has also been largely improved. mick. ps Scarab also provides subversion integration. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
