Thomas Fischer wrote:
Instead, I'd like to ignore line 4 ,which says
* Copyright 2001-2006 The Apache Software Foundation.
which would allow the copyright year to be different across files, and
people would not be tempted to change the copyright year in files which
did not change in any other way.
Actually the header has changed and it no longer includes the copyright
notice. See: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
Note also the first FAQ entry:
All releases created and distributed after November 1, 2006 must
comply with this policy.
So it looks like this needs to be dealt with before 3.2.1 is cut.
While I'm here, why aren't we calling this 3.3? I think 3.2.1 gives the
impression of minor fixes when in actual fact there are tonnes of new
features - IMO 3.3 would be a better way to go.
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
