See

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-torque-dev/200610.mbox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

  Thomas

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:

Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Greg Monroe wrote:
Well the SF project is listed as Apache 2.0, but just like
the Maven-plugin project, any SF.net approved Open source
license will do (all the common modern day one...).

IMO it would be a mistake to go with anything other than ASL 2.0.  But
let's not start that discussion here :-)

I would actually look for my DB PMC hat, dust it off and -1 any move
away from ASL 2.0.

I was AWOL for a while. Is there any special reason (license wise,
because that is the only one I can think of) why these add-ons went to
sf.net?

Opening a sandbox for that kind of stuff in DB should be easy and with
the labs.apache.org now in place, that might be a good place, too.

        Best regards
                Henning


--
Henning P. Schmiedehausen  -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux,
91054 Buckenhof, Germany   -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person
Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine guy

         "Save the cheerleader. Save the world."

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to