Yes.. I checked out the latest version of torque, modified the om-mojo and the templates. And yes, if this change will not be in the next release I would have to do it again. As you say, not the way it should be but releases don't come that often and the change takes 10 minutes to perform so it would be an acceptable solution.
The most difficult part would be to distribute the modified version in to the team in a correct manner. /Ludwig -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Fischer [mailto:fisc...@seitenbau.net] Sent: den 9 november 2009 16:55 To: Apache Torque Developers List Subject: Antwort: RE: Adding configuration paramater to maven plugin "Ludwig Magnusson" <lud...@itcatapult.com> schrieb am 09.11.2009 16:33:23: > ... > But I did not understand what you meant by > your last sentence: > "My personal opinion is that > the right thing to do is to better support template modifications." Perhaps I am jumping too far, but I was assuming that you have modified the templates such that the @SuppressWarnings annotation can be rendered or not ? If yes, what would you do if a new version of Torque would bring new templates: You would have to do the same modification again to the templates. Which is not the way it should be. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-h...@db.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-h...@db.apache.org
