On 22 Nov 2011, at 5:37 AM, Thomas Fox wrote:

The gump build for torque 4 fails for a long time now. Do we think we need a gump build ? If yes, does anybody have hints why the build fails ? If
not, how do we remove it ?

Gump is good :)

According to the error at the bottom of the gump mail, it looks like the rat plugin is complaining about a licensing issue, and I see some commits around licensing, so it might fix it:

[INFO] [apache-rat:check {execution: default}]
[INFO] Exclude: velocity.log
[INFO] Exclude: .checkstyle
[INFO] Exclude: derby.log
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Too many unapproved licenses: 1
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 1 minute 8 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Nov 22 03:33:11 UTC 2011
[INFO] Final Memory: 42M/132M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, I'd like to set up a jenkins build for torque 4. The idea would be to
build all torque components and then run the test project against an
embeddable database (preferably derby). This will tell people in a
reasonable time frame if the last commit broke anything. I'd volunteer to
administer the jenkins build.

As I understand it jenkins is different from gump because gump always takes the trunks as dependencies and only runs every day, whereas jenkins takes
the real dependency versions and runs after every commit.

The purpose of gump is to give early warning of when the trunk of project A breaks the trunk of project B. Without gump, you're only find out that project A broke project B way later on, when project A got released and you tried to use the new version.

That said, a jenkins build will also be useful, as it allows the build to be tested in more detail and more often.

Regards,
Graham
--


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to