Hi devs, preparing the release for torque 4.1/5.0 this stopped me in torque-templates: if providing an interface or peerInterface attribute in table element in schema.xml the generated results are not in the base classes (baseDbObject), but the (user extendable) "interface" classes. Is this correct? This is no problem for a newly generated project, but otherwise the user is required to delete his "interface" / not regenerated java classes and/or merge with his additions and changes or add it manually. If nobody objects we might proceed as it is now, I want only to be explicit at this place. Best regards, Georg P.S.: I found in torque-templates changes.xml (concerning 4.0) that some options are renamed: torque.addIntakeRetrievable to torque:addBaseDbObjectInterface and torque.retrievableInterface to torque:baseDbObjectInterface. Yet I could not find any references in the current trunk to these new options, but instead still the old ones are used (in options.properties and templates vm files). Do I miss something?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
