I support it as we move Turbine toward more modern Java support - torque
is an integral part :-)
-
Jeff
On 5/9/26 08:16, Tilmann Zäschke wrote:
Hi Georg,
I'm not a torque user, so I have no stake in this.
I'm just wondering what the motivation is?
Often, libraries tend to be intentionally slow with updating
requirements (e.g. required Java version). I'm just guessing but many
projects that require torque may be stuck on older Java version?
What are the advantages of upgrading to Java 21?
Again, don't let me stop you, I have no stake in this, just some
thoughts from my side :-)
Best,
Til
On 08/05/2026 11:18, Kallidis, Georg wrote:
Hi Torque Devs,
I propose updating Torque to version 8.0-SNAPSHOT and setting Java
version
to 21 (from 17).
Accompanying this I would commit this with a couple of dependency
updates ..
This would be the next bottom line version for the next Torque release.
Without opposing replies, I would proceed and update the trunk in the
next
weeks.
Thanks,
Best regards, Georg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
