Here is snippet from torque-gen-3.1/templates/om/MapBuilder.vm
#if ($generateDeprecated == "true")
/**
* Item
* @deprecated use ${table.JavaName}Peer.TABLE_NAME constant
*/
public static String getTable()
{
return "$table.Name";
}
#foreach ($col in $table.Columns)
#set ( $tfc=$table.JavaName )
#set ( $cfc=$col.JavaName )
#set ( $cup=$col.Name.toUpperCase() )
/**
* ${table.Name}.$cup
* @return the column name for the $cup field
* @deprecated use ${table.JavaName}Peer.${table.Name}.$cup constant
*/
public static String get${tfc}_${cfc}()
{
return "${table.Name}.$cup";
}
#end
#end
Scott Eade wrote:
> Rob Gordon wrote:
>
> >Anybody out there (Yo! Scott Eade! :) know why the
> >getTable() method in MapBuilder is deprecated?
> >
> >It points to a day past when MapBuilders were not so tightly coupled with
> >their table name and could--perhaps--be paramaterized with a table
> >name, thereby being used to map multiple tables (of same structure)
> >to a database....which happens to be exactly what I want to do!
> >
> >I am wondering if the deprecation of getTable suggests an evolutionary
> >dead-end toward which I may be heading (though what I want to do
> >seems easy enough....with minor template changes).
> >
> >
> getTable()? I don't see it.
>
> Scott
>
> --
> Scott Eade
> Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd.
> http://www.backstagetech.com.au
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
