Jim,
I still not understand the cause of the problem and your solution. What did
you do to make the error do away ?
Looking at the generated code, I do not see how accessing the static method
of one table could possibly initialize or re-initialize the Map builder of
another table.
Thomas
Jim Caserta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 15.03.2005 20:00:02:
> Thomas,
>
> You are right. It appears that by executing the
> following:
> BaseTABLENAMEPeer.executeStatement("SET CURRENT SQLID
> = '" +
> db2Schema...
> for each of the tables that would have been deleted in
> a Cascade Delete, it somehow re-initialized Tables in
> the dbMap.
>
> Now all I have to do is get the Updates and Inserts
> working..
> Thanks for all your help!
>
> Jim
>
> --- Thomas Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jim,
> >
> > Sorry, I should have read your mail more cautiously;
> > I was again
> > mistaken...
> > But nonetheless, I am still confused.
> >
> > There should be code in the generated xxxBasePeer
> > class which looks like
> >
> > public static MapBuilder getMapBuilder(String
> > name)
> > {
> > try
> > {
> > MapBuilder mb = (MapBuilder)
> > mapBuilders.get(name);
> > // Use the 'double-check pattern' for
> > syncing
> > // caching of the MapBuilder.
> > if (mb == null)
> > {
> > synchronized (mapBuilders)
> > {
> > mb = (MapBuilder)
> > mapBuilders.get(name);
> > if (mb == null)
> > {
> > mb = (MapBuilder)
> > Class.forName(name).newInstance();
> > // Cache the MapBuilder
> > before it is built.
> > mapBuilders.put(name, mb);
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > ....
> >
> > This should cache the map builder in the dbMap. The
> > method is called from
> > the static initializer of the xxxBasePeer class,
> > which should be called at
> > the latest when you call xxxPeer.DoDelete(). If you
> > have the possibility to
> > debug your code, you might want to put a breakpoint
> > in there and see
> > whether and when it it called.
> >
> > There are two reasons I can think of why the Table
> > does not appear in the
> > dbMap (there might be more)
> > 1) Torque is not initialized or it is initialized
> > more than once
> > 2) For some obscure reason, the xxxBasePeer class is
> > not loaded while you
> > execute the doDelete().
> >
> > To exclude 2), you can force the classLoader to load
> > the xxxBasePeer class
> > by issuing
> >
> class.ForName("fully.qualified.name.of.xxxBasePeer");
> > before the delete. But ") is very improbable, as the
> > Java Language
> > specification explicitly states that a class is
> > loaded immediately before
> > you execute one of its static methods....
> >
> > JLS 2.0 �12.4.1--
> > "A class or interface type T will be initialized
> > immediately before the
> > first occurrence of any one of the following:
> > . T is a class and an instance of T is created.
> > . T is a class and a static method declared by T is
> > invoked.
> > . A static field declared by T is assigned.
> > . A static field declared by T is used and the
> > reference to the field is
> > not a compile-time constant (�15.28). References to
> > compile-time constants
> > must be resolved at compile time to a copy of the
> > compile-time constant
> > value, so uses of such a field never cause
> > initialization."
> >
> > If you can solve this, I (and probably some more
> > people on the list) would
> > be very interested to know how this problem could
> > originate.
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 14.03.2005 19:49:22:
> >
> > >
> > > Tom,
> > >
> > > Yes it does. In the tables MapBulder class it has
> > the following:
> > >
> > > dbMap = Torque.getDatabaseMap("default");
> > > dbMap.addTable("PMTEM021_POLOFFR");
> > > TableMap tMap =
> > dbMap.getTable("PMTEM021_POLOFFR");
> > > tMap.setPrimaryKeyMethod("none");
> > > tMap.addPrimaryKey("PMTEM021_POLOFFR.OFFRG_N", new
> > String());
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > > Thomas Fischer
> >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > u.net>
> > To
> > > "Apache
> > Torque Users List"
> >
> > > 03/14/2005 10:44
> > <[email protected]>
> >
> > > AM
> > cc
> > >
> >
> > >
> > Subject
> > > Please respond to RE:
> > doDelete problem, null dbMap
> >
> > > "Apache Torque
> >
> > > Users List"
> >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > pache.org>
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim,
> > >
> > > if the db map is not null, but the column is not
> > mapped, then I was
> > > mistaken about the cause of the error, and
> > class.forName() is of no use.
> > >
> > > Can you look at the map package
> > (${target.package}.map), locate the Map
> > > class for the Table, and see if it has got an
> > entry for the column
> > OFFRG_N
> > > ?
> > >
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
