> That approach is certainly feasible. > But i was looking for something on the lines of providing the table list as > an input to the jdbc task, but it seems that currently there is no way of > doing that. >
The current jdbc task does not allow that. It could be written in, I suppose, but in practice, it is done as Alvaro suggested--rename the current file, run the jdbc task again, and diff the two to get the "new stuff". Good luck! Brendan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
