On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Adrian Buehlmann <adr...@cadifra.com> wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Adrian Buehlmann <adr...@cadifra.com>
> # Date 1253018428 -7200
> # Node ID 872342294b88f713cb43b293a1a8e562772f5f87
> # Parent  f83cb2afb97e5b34d8924a9fc829a43a83c96823
> status: put status file type checkboxes into expander

Nice, this one was the keeper.

After thinking about this some more, I would be fine with removing the
MAR checkboxes and only having ?! and CI (two columns, two rows).

repo.status() does not even give you the option of *not* getting MAR
files, so there's no benefit in not asking for them.  Those checkboxes
are vestiges of the original gstatus command that wanted to be 100%
command line compliant with normal status.  It's not so important for
hgtk st and ci.

--
Steve Borho

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-develop mailing list
Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop

Reply via email to