On 23.09.2009 13:24, Yuki KODAMA wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 19:56, Yuki KODAMA <endflow....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Yuki KODAMA <endflow....@gmail.com>
>> # Date 1253703176 -32400
>> # Node ID f27bbcd4e43a43680c6c099da3737497274b4bea
>> # Parent  805554cc13d85d6cebd468c213290f35f3e0ce2c
>> update: introduce 'interactive update' feature
> 
> By this patch, we got a new update method (Thanks Steve!).

Offering to shelve an uncommitted merge seems incorrect to me.

> I suppose we don't need to display all options on start up of Update
> dialog any more. So I have a plan to replace options to drop-down list.

I don't want to have -C in a combobox (I assume drop-down = combobox).
For the reasons I have already stated.

> With "Interactive update", mostly users (incl. me) don't need to change
> option before pressing "Update" button since now we can proceed
> the update interactively.

But TortoiseHg lacks psychic powers to detect when I deliberately want
to wipe out my local changes with -C, doesn't it?

So I think we at least we need:

  Options:   (*) Interactive

             ( ) Discard local changes, no backup (-C/--clean)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-develop mailing list
Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop

Reply via email to