On 30.03.2010 20:06, Steve Borho wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Yuki KODAMA <endflow....@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:48, Adrian Buehlmann <adr...@cadifra.com> wrote: >>> On 30.03.2010 18:15, Steve Borho wrote: >>>> 1.0.1 hasn't been released yet, and you've already made the stable >>>> branch unbearable to work on. :) >>> >>> One of the reasons why this project's release procedures should be >>> rethought. >>> >>> Who wants to wait 3 more months for this? >>> >>>> Seriously, the new progress bars are awesome. >>> >>> Me wonders why we can't ship them in 1.0.1... >> >> Logically, it can be shipped in 1.0.1 because first minor release allows >> some improvements. In fact, I was introduced a small improvement: >> http://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/stable/issue/1028/show-the-current-explorer-filter-more >> >> I also want to push this feature to stable, but I can't guarantee that there >> is >> no fatal issue in my code since we have no time to test it enough in this >> case.
Right, but I would say a cooling time of one week would be enough for this. The Mantra is: Release early, release often. > I've no problem with transplanting it to stable after 1.0.1. There's > some precedence for this. 1.0.2 sounds good. But I was just stressing on the "the stable branch is already unbearable to work with". There is some truth in that sentence to ponder about... [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
