Steve Borho wrote: > > Hmm, I think we need another name; hgqt is not easy to type or remember > > for lusers. ...might even go as keeping hgtk, or maybe thg. > > I was speaking of folders, not executables. My intent is to keep hgtk > as the command line tool until the Qt port is finished. At that point > it probably makes sense to switch to something more agnostic. We can > have a debate about that name later.
Yes, it may be too early to, but I want to say loudly I like `hq` :) And according to debian, there's no command named `hq` yet. [1] [1]: http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=hq&mode=path&suite=stable&arch=any Yuya, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
