On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 01:46 +0000, TK Soh wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 11:02 PM, Peer Sommerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > People often mention mercurial queues as a nice tool for local work. Since > > gquilt works with Mercurial, it could make sense to integrate it into thg. > > > > However, I don't think gquilt is sufficiently integrated with Mercurial > > workflows. One step towards integration is to identify valuable use cases: > > > > On the mercurial mail list some persons indicate that they use mq for > > temporary work, and want to share the patches between machines. This is > > easier if you use qinit -c and share the mq repository. This could probably > > be made easier with some specific dialogs, bult upon the "Syncronize" > > concept. > > > > When I hack away, I often mix new features, bug fixes, and local environment > > adaption. This can be supported with guards, but there may be even better > > ways to support this. Maybe branches on the mq repo. > > > > How do you use mq? > > I almost never use mq myself. Though I acknowledge the importance of > mq within the Mercurial community, so we will definitely want to have > the support for mq in TortoiseHg. > > It a matter of when and how.
I would like to add mq support (via gquilt or other) in the 0.4 or 0.5 time-frame. I think in 0.4 we should try to improve support for named branches. -- Steve Borho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.borho.org/~steve/steve.asc Key fingerprint = 2D08 E7CF B624 624C DE1F E2E4 B0C2 5292 F2C6 2C8C ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
