On 05.08.2008 10:57, Peter Arrenbrecht wrote:
> Besides, I agree with TK that unless there are very compelling reasons
> to cherry-pick fixes, THg should track Hg's official releases. This
> way it's much easier for people to know what Hg they've got and
> communicate this in bug reports and such.
Besides, what's so difficult about
> hg version
Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 626cb86a6523+tortoisehg)
when reporting bugs?
The first string ("626cb86a6523") identifies the Mercurial part
of THG.
I haven't checked how to identify the THG part on the command
line. But it can be seen in the about dialog, which in my
example shows:
'''
TortoiseHg (version 0.4rc2)
with Mercurial-626cb86a6523+tortoisehg, Python-2.5.1, PyGTK-2.10.6, GTK-2.10.11
'''
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
