On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Peer Sommerlund
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> 2009/1/18 TK Soh <[email protected]>
>>
>> Greeting!
>>
>> We are pleased to announce that the installer for TortoiseHg 0.6 is
>> now available for download on SourceForge:
>
> Have you considered making at least one RC release part of the release
> process?

Release candidates are good to have. But with tortoisehg being very
far from 1.0, we expect to see a lot of bug reports on each releases
(and release candidates too). So I am not sure how much RC can really
help us.

> One way to do it would be to have 1 week period from RC to release. This
> would give non-developers a chance to find issues.
>
> It could also be an occasion for developers to "bug-stamp" the SF bug
> tracker. Or perhaps that should be 1 week before RC..
>
> I know that the developer count is 1 + 0.5 + 0.1 + 0.01 which is not much.

Exactly (actually the '1' is more like 0.3 these days. We really need
more 'full-time' developers)

It takes a lot of energy to cut one release of TortoiseHg, and it's
not really something I can afford very often. If anyone would like to
volunteer to take care of this, then maybe we can make the release
process more 'formal', ie. RC before final release.

Hopefully thing will be simpler by the time we are done simplifying
the build process.

> But just having the occasion might attack a little more resources.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss

Reply via email to