Douglas Philips wrote: > On or about 2009 Feb 17, at 10:44 PM, Gary Ruben indited: <snip> > I don't think we should do that in the TortoiseHg install, esp. if it > isn't done in the standard Mercurial releases. > > --Doug > > P.S. If you want to know even a part of my concern for the keyword > extension problems, look at the Mercurial issue tracker and mailing list > archive. <shudder/>
Hi Doug, I could only see a couple of issues in the issue tracker, one of which is possibly a cvs-to-Mercurial converter issue and one to do with $Revision$ tag not updating (it's working on my system). Could you point me at an issue or archived post if you think it'll break my code? My use case for using this is that I have a single Python script that I'm developing and deploying onto another machine. I need to ensure that I can track the script output against the version number so I want the script to have access to its Revision info and also to be able to look at the script to see what its version is. Doing this without RCS-style keywords are perfect for this. Gary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
