On 2011-07-03 21:56, Steve Borho wrote: > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Mads Kiilerich <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi >> >> Are there any known issues with running TortoiseHg 1.1.10 with Mercurial >> 1.9? If so: Are there any plans to release an update in the 1.x series? > > Only the dozen or so API changes. I likely won't have any time for > updating the hgtk branch any time soon.
I'm not interested in TortoiseHg 1.x any more either. But I wouldn't mind if someone else wants to continue it. >> That is relevant for distributions where Mercurials strong compatibility >> promises might make it acceptable as a bugfix, but a switch from gtk to >> qt isn't. > > Anyone is welcome to review the changes made to hglib between 2.0 and > 2.1 and make appropriate changes to hgtk. Be aware there were changes > to MQ and a few other places that didn't get shims in hglib just > because they happened late. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
