2011/7/28 Andreas Tscharner <[email protected]>: > On 28.07.2011 16:46, Peer Sommerlund wrote: >> What is the current state of the "Hunk Selection" feature? Are there any >> plans to implement it in 2.2? >> >> How does this differ from what you can do with shelve today? >> >> Are you thinking of having shelve integrated into the commit widget? > > Sort of. > > I always looked at the improved shelve tool as a workaround. Compared to > the "Hunk Selection" in hgtk, the shelve tool is more complicated: First > I have to switch to the shelve tool, then I have to shelve (and > therefore add) hunks I DON'T want to commit. After committing I have to > unshelve (after having switched to the shelve tool again) the remaining > hunks. > > A hunk selection, where I can select what to commit and after committing > the remaining hunks are automatically back as uncommitted changes, is A > LOT simpler...
My time available for thg hacking is limited these days, so I have no firm plans for this. My hope is that someone will rewrite the record extension to use a memctx, and then thg can leverage this code directly. Patrick made a lot of progress in this direction in the run up to 1.9, but I don't think it is finished yet. -- Steve Borho ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
