On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:30:38 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > Is there any point in reporting bugs in an old version, specifically > 1.0.4? I had some crashes when I attempted to work with a 400MB file.
I would say "try recent version." FWIW, if you prefer 1.x (i.e. Gtk) version, there's a community fork which catches up recent changes of Mercurial: https://bitbucket.org/hstuart/hgtk/ (and pulled into https://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/hgtk/) > Also, are there any issues I should be aware of before upgrading to the > current version? Aside from wondering if it will eat my records, I'm > also working with someone who may not upgrade, and I want to know if it > is reasonable for them to continue without upgrading if I do. Mercurial should maintain backward compatibility. For details, please read the following pages: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/UpgradingMercurial http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/UpgradeNotes Regards, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
