Hi Chris, On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:00 PM, <tosdr.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi ! > > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 6:27:14 PM UTC+2, Michael Stemle wrote: >> >> I know that this is my first message to the group, but I've been watching >> for a while and I would like to jump in and help. >> >> > Welcome then ! > > >> >> >> > I would like to help construct a proposal for a standardized scoring >> system. This scoring system would focus not on independent clauses in the >> document, but rather questions like: "can site X track you outside of your >> own site? -20 points" or "does organization Y promise to disclose >> government requests for information? +20 points." Something simple, which >> when aggregated could output a score. >> >> > So far, the scoring systems works more or less like this with the need to > understand the whole ToS of a service, which is complicated if you just > want to submit a couple of data points. Also classes are given afterwards. > > My intake would be to have a % formula. Something along : > > * for all data points where the max points is 100 for every point > * sum(collected point)/sum(max of all points possible) = % > * with a scale like > >90 => A class > 89 - 80 => B class > 79 - 70 => C class > 69 - 60 => D class > 59 - 50 => E class > <49 => F class > Yes, that's basically what the script does that I mentioned - https://github.com/tosdr/tosdr-build/blob/master/scripts/checkclasses.js That script was retro-engineered to try to describe what algorithm we seemed to be using in practice. :) Let's chat about it in tonight's meeting - we can post the meeting notes here and then continue to discuss from there, on this mailing list. > > And we keep the standardized points like you said, which we already have > (needs some update tho). > > >> I would like to find two or three other people to work with in this >> endeavor, the product of which would be a document outlining the process >> for measuring, scoring, and preparing this proposal for a vote by >> contributors. Since there's a lot to review, I think keeping the number of >> people down will help us come to something that we can open to the wider >> group more quickly. >> >> > We have a meeting tonight at 8pm (France Time) : > https://framatalk.org/tosdr and for the things to discuss : > https://pad.lqdn.fr/p/tosdr > > Let's talk about this :) > > chris > > -- > [!!] Please see https://edit.tosdr.org -- this is where new contributions > should be submitted and discussed > > tosdr.org | twitter.com/tosdr | github.com/tosdr > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Terms of Service; Didn't Read" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to tosdr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to tosdr@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tosdr. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/tosdr/b0ba8b9c-02b9-4150-a4b0-bda562d45fbf%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tosdr/b0ba8b9c-02b9-4150-a4b0-bda562d45fbf%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- [!!] Please see https://edit.tosdr.org -- this is where new contributions should be submitted and discussed tosdr.org | twitter.com/tosdr | github.com/tosdr --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Terms of Service; Didn't Read" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tosdr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tosdr@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tosdr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tosdr/CA%2BaD3u0Dd8S945B%3DUPb%2BmR1GsUOVCpAFtP2Gb2OWsLG8hPmqUA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
