I just tested it on Wily and it is setting the sampling_down_factor properly. Thanks!
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/sampling_down_factor 100 $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor ondemand -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1483586 Title: On demand cpufreq govneror causes large amounts of jitter Status in sysvinit package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in sysvinit source package in Trusty: New Status in sysvinit source package in Vivid: New Bug description: == Comment: #0 - Anton Blanchard <ant...@au1.ibm.com> - 2015-07-16 22:22:09 == We are seeing large amounts of jitter caused by od_dbs_timer(). We should slow down the rate of updates and or turn this into a timer. Having a workqueue execute so often is very noticeable. # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/workqueue/workqueue_execute_start/enable (wait a while) # cat /sys/kernel/debug/trace <...>-67605 [040] .... 849622.393576: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fba1ba20: function od_dbs_timer <...>-67605 [040] .... 849622.403574: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fba1ba20: function od_dbs_timer <...>-116685 [048] .... 849622.403575: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fbc1ba20: function od_dbs_timer <...>-116685 [048] .... 849622.413574: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fbc1ba20: function od_dbs_timer <...>-67605 [040] .... 849622.413575: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fba1ba20: function od_dbs_timer <...>-67605 [040] .... 849622.423575: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fba1ba20: function od_dbs_timer <...>-116685 [048] .... 849622.433574: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fbc1ba20: function od_dbs_timer <...>-67605 [040] .... 849622.433574: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fba1ba20: function od_dbs_timer <...>-116685 [048] .... 849622.443573: workqueue_execute_start: work struct c0000007fbc1ba20: function od_dbs_timer == Comment: #1 - Shilpasri G. Bhat <shigb...@in.ibm.com> - 2015-07-22 19:42:38 == Hi Anton, We can set the governor's tunable 'sampling_down_factor' to decrease the rate of updates. When this tunable is set to a value greater than 1, the sampling period of the governor is increased during the peak load to sampling_period times sampling_down_factor. This will reduce the jitter caused by od_dbs_timer() when the cpu is busy. I am currently running benchmarks to find out the optimal value for this tunable and will post them soon. Thanks and Regards, Shilpa == Comment: #2 - Anton Blanchard <ant...@au1.ibm.com> - 2015-07-31 03:44:49 == FYI We are also seeing high levels of CPU consumed by this on a LAMP workload: 2.54% kworker/0:0 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] osq_lock | ---osq_lock | |--99.83%-- mutex_optimistic_spin | __mutex_lock_slowpath | mutex_lock | | | |--80.08%-- od_dbs_timer 2.5% of total CPU time spent in the od_dbs_timer mutex. == Comment: #3 - Anton Blanchard <ant...@au1.ibm.com> - 2015-07-31 06:00:45 == Hitting this on a customer setup, raising priority == Comment: #4 - Shilpasri G. Bhat <shigb...@in.ibm.com> - 2015-08-03 06:47:40 == I used `perf top` and `perf record` to observe the overhead caused by 'osq_lock'. Both with ebizzy and SPECPower's ssjb workload I am able to see an overhead of 0.03% caused by 'osq_lock' with default governor settings. With sampling_down_factor=100, (1second) I am able to see 0.00% of overhead by 'osq_lock'. So this might not be a good data point to showcase, but by reducing the od_dbs_timer interrupts we are guaranteed to decrease the overhead caused by 'osq_lock'. == Comment: #5 - VAIDYANATHAN SRINIVASAN <svaid...@in.ibm.com> - 2015-08-03 09:09:09 == Hi Anton, Thanks for opening the bz to track and fix this issue. Shilpa is trying different workarounds. Here is our plan: (1) Use sampling_down_factor and other tunables in current Ubuntu releases to workaround the issue or minimise the impact. (2) Redesign cpufreq subsystem on powerpc similar to intel pstate driver so that we can program timers and cancel them dynamically based on different utilization points. Target Ubuntu 16.04 and then backport to 14.04.x and other distros. (3) Enhance design for (2) buy estimating core level utilization without running timers in each thread and then decide the target PState (4) Explore hardware assist so that we can avoid per-core estimation in software but still be able to set per-core PState. We need to take an interrupt or work-queue only to change PState and not really for estimation of load. Hence steady state load will experience zero jitter from cpufreq. --Vaidy == Comment: #7 - Shilpasri G. Bhat <shigb...@in.ibm.com> - 2015-08-04 07:49:23 == Workaround using ondemand tunable 'sampling_down_factor': File: /etc/init.d/ondemand (shell script which sets the governor after boot) if [ "$GOVERNOR" = "ondemand" ]; then echo 100 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/sampling_down_factor fi Setting the value of 100 to sampling_down_factor will increase the sampling period of ondemand governor to one second when the cpu is busy. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/1483586/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
