Thanks for the patch Ali! I uploaded a test package to ppa:dannf/test, and I've attempted to reproduce the improvement on a couple of different systems.
On a ThunderX system, I am observing a significant performance improvement. However, on an X-Gene system, the performance actually seems to be about the same slightly worse. Is that expected? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be Status in OpenSSL: New Status in openssl package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in openssl package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: The openssl build for arm64 doesn't compile in the assembly that is present in openssl as of version 1.0.2 for aarch64 because the debian- targets.patch that is applied specifies a target that doesn't have assembly. The line at issue is debian-arm64 target which needs ${no_asm} changed to ${aarch64_asm}:linux64. Running openssl speed -evp aes-128-gcm shows a 4x-16x improvement in performance with this change made and the package rebuilt. Other aes and sha variants show similar performance gains by enabling asm. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/1552939/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
