Public bug reported:

Get that logged:

 apparmor[451]:  * Starting AppArmor profiles
apparmor[451]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox
apparmor[451]: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session 
in /etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session at line 14: Could not open 
'abstractions/fcitx'
apparmor[451]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.sbin.rsyslogd
apparmor[451]: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session 
in /etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session at line 14: Could not open 
'abstractions/fcitx'
apparmor[451]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox
apparmor[451]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.sbin.rsyslogd

apparmor[451]:    ...fail!
systemd[1]: apparmor.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=123
systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: AppArmor initialization.
systemd[1]: apparmor.service: Unit entered failed state.
systemd[1]: apparmor.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
Package: apparmor 2.10.95-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Fri May  6 09:03:55 2016
ProcKernelCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-21-generic 
root=UUID=7c755ed6-51cc-4b75-88ac-9c75acf82749 ro
SourcePackage: apparmor
Syslog: May  6 06:55:04 u64 dbus[856]: [system] AppArmor D-Bus mediation is 
enabled
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug third-party-packages yakkety

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578938

Title:
  systemd[1]: apparmor.service: Control process exited, code=exited
  status=123

Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Get that logged:

   apparmor[451]:  * Starting AppArmor profiles
  apparmor[451]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox
  apparmor[451]: AppArmor parser error for 
/etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session in /etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session 
at line 14: Could not open 'abstractions/fcitx'
  apparmor[451]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.sbin.rsyslogd
  apparmor[451]: AppArmor parser error for 
/etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session in /etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session 
at line 14: Could not open 'abstractions/fcitx'
  apparmor[451]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox
  apparmor[451]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.sbin.rsyslogd

  apparmor[451]:    ...fail!
  systemd[1]: apparmor.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=123
  systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: AppArmor initialization.
  systemd[1]: apparmor.service: Unit entered failed state.
  systemd[1]: apparmor.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: apparmor 2.10.95-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Fri May  6 09:03:55 2016
  ProcKernelCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-21-generic 
root=UUID=7c755ed6-51cc-4b75-88ac-9c75acf82749 ro
  SourcePackage: apparmor
  Syslog: May  6 06:55:04 u64 dbus[856]: [system] AppArmor D-Bus mediation is 
enabled
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1578938/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to