I've looked into this a bit. Seems there's a change in behaviour between Qt5.5 and 5.6 in how the Flickable's contentItem->width is initially set - and this impacts the LVWPH
Try this demo Qt5.6 and LVWPH: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/16348569/ If you use anchors.fill, the contentItem width stays at 0. But setting width explicitly yields a correct contentItem width. I presume there's a widthChanged signal somewhere that needs to be listened to. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565763 Title: Unity8 scopes squeezed on Qt 5.6 Status in unity8 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: See attached screenshot. One can scroll it up/down and it stays like that. Seems to be just Unity 8 though, applications look normal. More information about Qt 5.6 at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/QtTesting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1565763/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
