@Joshua: Assuming that the server team wants to keep the ISO size CD compatible also in 17.04, your calculation indicates that you would need to use an alternative package for Chinese fonts even if we would do the split I mentioned in comment #4.
So I would say that the ball is in your court now. I see no other reason to spend time on a split of fonts-noto-cjk, and won't take any initiative doing so unless it actually makes things better. Please let me know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fonts-android in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626245 Title: [MIR] fonts-android Status in fonts-android package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in ghostscript package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Please include the fonts-android package in Ubuntu's component main. fonts-android includes the fonts-droid-fallback binary, and as a result of the discussion at bug 1625734, the server team wants that libgs9-common, which currently recommends fonts-noto-cjk, is changed to instead recommend fonts-droid-fallback. fonts-android is a Debian package and included in Debian's component main. It was included in Ubuntu's component main between trusty and wily. Bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=fonts-android https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android I have read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuMainInclusionRequirements, and haven't found any issues that would prevent the proposed main inclusion. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1626245/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
