This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.4
---------------
binutils (2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.4) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium
* SRU
* POWER backports (LP: #1655181)
- Don't treat .opd section specially when ELFv2.
- Fix PowerPC64 ELFv1 undefined weak functions.
- Modify POWER9 support to match final ISA 3.0 documentation.
* Fix PR gold/18989. Implement --push-state/--pop-state. LP: #1623418.
-- Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:30:30 +0100
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655181
Title:
P9 support in binutils
Status in binutils package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in binutils source package in Xenial:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[SRU Justification]
Hardware enablement of new P9 architecture on 16.04 LTS
[Test case]
Verify that the binutils testsuite still passes. This requires manual review
of the build logs.
[Regression potential]
One of the patches changes the behavior around handling of undefined weak
symbols on ppc64el as a whole. This behavior change could cause regressions on
code built for existing ppc64el targets. This is unlikely because nothing
should be relying on the current behavior, and this is an upstream patch driven
by the architecture owner.
One of the patches changes the set of assembly mnemonics available for
POWER9 opcodes. This should have no impact because nothing should be
relying on the not-yet-finalized P9 support in xenial.
The upstream binutils (2.27 and trunk) is almost complete for POWER9, but
unfortunately the changes expected to land in DD2 hardware have not yet been
set in stone. With that said, the remaining changes are fairly small and will
only affect user space; there are no kernel dependencies on the unresolved
architecture changes.
== Comment: #3 - Peter E. Bergner <berg...@us.ibm.com> - 2016-11-01 10:43:16
==
Complete POWER9 support is upstream and exists in trunk and the binutils 2.27
and 2.26 release branches.
== Comment: #4 - Breno Henrique Leitao <bren...@br.ibm.com> - 2016-11-21
12:45:53 ==
(In reply to comment #3)
> Complete POWER9 support is upstream and exists in trunk and the binutils
> 2.27 and 2.26 release branches.
Binutils version 2.27 is already in Ubuntu 17.04. Is there anything
else required?
== Comment: #5 - William J. Schmidt <wschm...@us.ibm.com> - 2016-11-21
13:32:50 ==
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Complete POWER9 support is upstream and exists in trunk and the binutils
> > 2.27 and 2.26 release branches.
>
> Binutils version 2.27 is already in Ubuntu 17.04. Is there anything else
> required?
Well, as long as they pick up the backported fixes, nothing else is
required. That's what this feature is there to ensure.
== Comment: #6 - Breno Henrique Leitao <bren...@br.ibm.com> - 2016-11-24
06:52:51 ==
Hi,
> Well, as long as they pick up the backported fixes, nothing else is
> required. That's what this feature is there to ensure.
Do you know, at this time, which are the fixes that will be requested
to be backported?
== Comment: #7 - William J. Schmidt <wschm...@us.ibm.com> - 2016-11-28
09:17:01 ==
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hi,
>
> > Well, as long as they pick up the backported fixes, nothing else is
> > required. That's what this feature is there to ensure.
>
> Do you know, at this time, which are the fixes that will be requested to be
> backported?
Peter, can you please respond to Breno's question?
== Comment: #8 - Peter E. Bergner <berg...@us.ibm.com> - 2016-11-29 12:08:11
==
CC'ing Alan in case he has an extra input.
Looking through the binutils-2_27-branch log, I see the following
commits we would want picked up:
commit 799b679496c98eb1f31625b00bb5db67a6f608d7
Author: Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Sep 16 16:17:46 2016 -0500
Backport lastest POWER9 support to match final ISA 3.0
documentation.
opcodes/
Apply from master.
2016-09-14 Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com>
* ppc-opc.c (powerpc_opcodes) <slbiag>: New mnemonic.
<addex., brd, brh, brw, lwzmx, nandxor, rldixor, setbool,
xor3>: Delete mnemonics.
<cp_abort>: Rename mnemonic from ...
<cpabort>: ...to this.
<setb>: Change to a X form instruction.
<sync>: Change to 1 operand form.
<copy>: Delete mnemonic.
<copy_first>: Rename mnemonic from ...
<copy>: ...to this.
<paste, paste.>: Delete mnemonics.
<paste_last>: Rename mnemonic from ...
<paste.>: ...to this.
gas/
Apply from master.
2016-09-14 Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com>
* testsuite/gas/ppc/power9.d <slbiag, cpabort> New tests.
<addex., brd, brh, brw, lwzmx, nandxor, rldixor, setbool,
xor3, cp_abort, copy_first, paste, paste_last, sync>: Remove
tests.
<copy, paste.>: Update tests.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/power9.s: Likewise.
commit c6a7c521c14e0cc188ccc0388e0d5d21c2042c94
Author: Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Sep 1 14:56:52 2016 +0930
Don't treat .opd section specially when ELFv2
Fixes a gdb segfault if a section named .opd is found in ELFv2
binaries.
* elf64-ppc.c (synthetic_opd): New static var.
(compare_symbols): Don't treat symbols in .opd specially for
ELFv2.
(ppc64_elf_get_synthetic_symtab): Likewise. Comment.
commit 2a0b8eb7a7974ff7605cb3ba5dffa5abef286ffa
Author: Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 30 20:57:32 2016 +0930
ppc apuinfo for spe parsed incorrectly
apuinfo saying SPE resulted in mach = bfd_mach_ppc_vle due to a
missing break.
PR 20531
* elf32-ppc.c (_bfd_elf_ppc_set_arch): Add missing "break".
commit 7f27ccfcd5b86a6517a5c01d1cc29e87ac39c13c
Author: Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Aug 19 11:06:41 2016 +0930
PR 20472, PowerPC64 ifunc confusion
This patch fixes quite a lot of confusion in allocate_dynrelocs over
ifuncs. Function descriptors make ELFv1 quite different to ELFv2.
PR 20472
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_before_check_relocs): Tweak abiversion
test.
(readonly_dynrelocs): Comment fix.
(global_entry_stub): New function.
(ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Tweak abiversion test. Match
ELFv2 code deciding on dynamic relocs vs. global entry stubs to
that in size_global_entry_stubs, handling ifunc too. Delete dead
weak sym code.
(allocate_dynrelocs): Ensure dyn_relocs field is cleared when no
dyn_relocs are needed. Correct handling of ifunc dyn_relocs.
Tidy ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS code, only setting dynindx for
undefweak syms. Expand and correct comments.
(size_global_entry_stubs): Ensure symbol is defined.
(ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Match condition under which
dyn_relocs are emitted to that in allocate_dynrelocs.
commit e4aa8a9f60398eacd04398bcc51d7be5f93ed4eb
Author: Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Aug 11 12:30:52 2016 +0930
PowerPC64 ELFv1 undefined weak functions
Undefined weak functions, like __gmon_start__, were not being made
dynamic or emitting plt call code. While the behaviour of undefined
weak symbols is not defined in the ELF standard, the intention on
powerpc64 was to make it possible to link without a definition of such
symbols and at run time behave the same as if a definition was found
at link time in a shared library.
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Don't exit with
non_got_ref true in any case where we could have generated dynbss
copies but decide not to do so.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1655181/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
