> 1. does on the system running also take quite some time if you do like "systemctl stop irqbalance"?
I have tested this now multiple times by stopping and starting it again and all looked fine. > 2. I'd assume that systemd concurrently stops multiple things and irqbalance > is just the last to print but not the one you are actually waiting on. Based on the above this might be true. So is it a known issue that systemd prints wrong things? I think this is an issue that should be actually fixed before tinkering around on every shutdow delay issue (also [1] blames that [2] isn't reliable enough so it would eventually also make sense to wait for [1]'s implementation). ** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729192 Title: Shutdown needs often longer than usual Status in irqbalance package in Ubuntu: New Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 dev with irqbalance 1.1.0-2.3ubuntu1 and for some weeks on shutting down the system often (around 50%-75%) I'm seeing that the irqbalance job needs some seconds to shutdown causing to delay the system shutdown noticeable. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1729192/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp