Thanks a lot Simon for your thoughts - this is exactly what I was
looking for.

"On a hypervisor, binding on link local IPs is undesirable IMHO"
Thats what I thought as well

But - if there is valid use of link locals in general - as I was unsure of and 
you as well suggest there might be folks doing that; then we do not want to 
ignore them by default.
TL;DR we better have it working for all and have those "undesired" disabling it 
instead of not working by default in some environments.

If more people chime in we can make an overall summary and either reopen or 
keep as is.
For now this stays incomplete.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737998

Title:
  trying to bind on all interfaces is a good default, but fails on ipv6
  link local

Status in ntp package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  The default is "grab all" which is great for convenience and can be
  configured to be differently by argument -I (interface) or interface
  commands in the config.

  Currently it is "too" open on that.
  I see it trying to bing link local addresses for each of the KVM guests I 
spawn.
  They get virtual network devices and due to that ntp sees it tries to bind 
and fails.

     Dez 13 11:35:41 seidel ntpd[35826]: bind(31) AF_INET6 
fe80::fc54:ff:fec3:3eb0%47#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested 
address
     Dez 13 11:35:41 seidel ntpd[35826]: unable to create socket on vnet0 (27) 
for fe80::fc54:ff:fec3:3eb0%47#123
     Dez 13 11:35:41 seidel ntpd[35826]: failed to init interface for address 
fe80::fc54:ff:fec3:3eb0%47

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1737998/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to