Regarding #2 from comment #19: As the defined range for the ipv6.mtu is from IPV6_MIN_MTU to the device's MTU, and the existing API returns an error if the ipv6.mtu is out of range, I think it's reasonable for a configuration with the ipv6.mtu > device MTU to fail.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671951 Title: networkd should allow configuring IPV6 MTU Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in netplan.io package in Ubuntu: New Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in cloud-init source package in Bionic: Confirmed Status in netplan.io source package in Bionic: New Status in systemd source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Bug description: = systemd = [Impact] * IPv6 traffic failing to send/receive due to incompatible/low MTU setting. Specifically, IPv6 traffic may have higher MTU requirements than IPv4 traffic and thus may need to be overridden and/or set to a higher value than IPv6 traffic. [Test Case] * Use IPv6MTUBytes= setting in a .network unit * Restart systemd-network * Check that there no error messages / warnings about not-recognizing this option * Check that MTU bytes, is at least IPv6MTUBytes on the interface [Regression Potential] * This is a future compatible backport of an additional keyword not used by default. It may result in MTU change to a higher value, which should not cause loss of connectivity. [Other Info] * Original bug report below = end of systemd = 1) Zesty 2) systemd-232-19 3) I need to configure the IPV6 MTU for tunneling by adding an IPv6MTUBytes=1480 value in the .network file for an interface with an IPV6 static address in the [Network] section 4) networkd does not parse or read the value and does not apply this configuration to the interface. Upstream has discussed this issue here: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/1533 But it's been closed in favor of only setting via RA. However, we know of multiple use-case which are currently supported in ifdupdown where we want to retain control over IPV6 MTU values outside of PMTU Discovery configurations. Some context from those discussions >> Client systems that route their ipv6 packets to a 6in4 router also >> have to have their ipv6 mtu lowered. They could lower their link mtu, >> so their ipv6 packets are small enough, but that reduces performance >> of their ipv4 network. Yes. Anything that creates a PMTUD black hole can result in situations where the higher header overhead of IPv6 will cause IPv4 to pass but IPv6 traffic to be dropped. One example here is egress from an ipsec tunnel wherein the next hop MTU is too low for IPv6 datagrams to pass. Another is VM -> whatever -> host bridge -> tunnel ingress. If the datagram cannot enter the tunnel due to size, it is dropped, and an ICMP response uses the tunnel address as a source, which may not be routable back to the origin. This one is an issue with IPv4 as well, and is one case where manually setting the IPv6 MTU lower than the (also manually set) device MTU is of benefit. In essence, any of these sort of cases that require an explicit setting of the device MTU will likely require a setting of the IPv6 mtu as well to account for its larger header overhead. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1671951/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp