Build log with the above two patches applied, unit tests fail.
** Attachment added:
"buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.librsvg_2.44.15-1ubuntu1_ppa8_BUILDING.txt.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+attachment/5307181/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.librsvg_2.44.15-1ubuntu1_ppa8_BUILDING.txt.gz
** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Olivier Tilloy (osomon)
** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657
Title:
librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal
Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and
librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built
fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on
ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022).
The upstream commit that addresses this is
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8.
I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the
source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests
consistently fail, on all architectures.
The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using
the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably
update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
