Public bug reported:

1) OS: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS

2) Package: login 1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4 amd64 from xenial-updates/main

3) After installing this package, I expect /etc/login.defs to contain
only ASCII characters.

4) Instead, /etc/login.defs contains an Acute Accent (Unicode U+00B4) on
line 221 in a comment:

=== Quote From File ===

# If set to yes, userdel will remove the user´s group if it contains no

=== End Quote ===

This causes a problem in SaltStack:
https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/55695

SaltStack does recognize that they should do a better job at loading
this file and is planning on fixing its problem. But I still question
this: Should we expect /etc/login.defs to contain ASCII characters only?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: login 1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-1101.112-aws 4.4.208
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-1101-aws x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.21
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Mar 26 17:46:26 2020
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: shadow
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869267

Title:
  /etc/login.defs contains a non-ASCII character

Status in shadow package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  1) OS: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS

  2) Package: login 1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4 amd64 from xenial-updates/main

  3) After installing this package, I expect /etc/login.defs to contain
  only ASCII characters.

  4) Instead, /etc/login.defs contains an Acute Accent (Unicode U+00B4)
  on line 221 in a comment:

  === Quote From File ===

  # If set to yes, userdel will remove the user´s group if it contains
  no

  === End Quote ===

  This causes a problem in SaltStack:
  https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/55695

  SaltStack does recognize that they should do a better job at loading
  this file and is planning on fixing its problem. But I still question
  this: Should we expect /etc/login.defs to contain ASCII characters
  only?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: login 1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-1101.112-aws 4.4.208
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-1101-aws x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.21
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Mar 26 17:46:26 2020
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: shadow
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1869267/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to