apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890006/+attachment/5397969/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890006 Title: Hash mismatch on "apt update" Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: This is a really weird bug that is happening on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (Live ISO!!!) and Kali 2020.2, but not Debian 10 (so, it affects at least apt 2.0.2ubuntu0.1 and does not affect 1.8.2.1). It also only occurs on a single PC (as far as I know). All testing was done in Virtualbox and moving VM's to another PC fixed issue (without changing anything inside the VM). On running "apt update", there is an error "Hash Sum mismatch" which shows that SHA1 and SHA256 hashes differ from expected (while MD5 and file size is correct). E.g.: Hash Sum mismatch Hashes of expected file: - Filesize:314536 [weak] - SHA256:aa1c6c96b09a0c695dc475d99b407c675e564fbfe51b3e26230c6320b45666d0 - SHA1:4f438d7e0c78dfb0486f86dc0a3dba30575eb617 [weak] - MD5Sum:5269212c54feb3dceabadb66583f6778 [weak] Hashes of received file: - SHA256:f47a968e7a10aff91df8b1d3f682ce11d161ff1b17056268b9ae1c10447523b2 - SHA1:2839e062232ed234d0c04e60fe6b2a687c950e5b [weak] - MD5Sum:5269212c54feb3dceabadb66583f6778 [weak] - Filesize:314536 [weak] I ran packet capture and extracted archives which are getting verified. All of their hashes are correct (exactly as expected). It seems that calculating SHA1 and SHA256 the way APT does it produces wrong result, while running command line tools sha1sum and sha256sum (on the same PC inside the same VM) produces correct result. I wrote the minimal reproducible example (hashtest.cc) that produces output such as this: Calculating hashes same way apt does. - MD5Sum:c89b13b76197d0d554400e00e46c0740 - SHA1:f6901a4486e69a1f503401daa02b520f1b0e22ba - SHA256:9075301b3961aca23b69bf2868a18dca184b383a0ec1de35516f0a8a182c2cb6 - SHA512:7506f6f5c5d5e97f8c6ecac2489e7d6260002bd530370c6193a04620f94285dca0f5cf2bb9ead40afbd72fdf3a239349a57f81165b5b857af6ad7ddeab8da036 - Checksum-FileSize:892549 Calculating hashes through command line tools. - md5sum: c89b13b76197d0d554400e00e46c0740 - sha1sum: f6901a4486e69a1f503401daa02b520f1b0e22ba - sha256sum: 9075301b3961aca23b69bf2868a18dca184b383a0ec1de35516f0a8a182c2cb6 - sha512sum: 7506f6f5c5d5e97f8c6ecac2489e7d6260002bd530370c6193a04620f94285dca0f5cf2bb9ead40afbd72fdf3a239349a57f81165b5b857af6ad7ddeab8da036 It's in the attachment alongside with an example file that causes this hash mismatch. There's also debug.log which contains various versions, etc (although as I said, it has been verified on latest Ubuntu Live ISO). I have a suspicion that the bug is in the gcrypt library, not apt itself, but I haven't yet verified it. The libgcrypt20 version in Ubuntu is 1.8.5-5ubuntu1 (in Kali as well), while Debian 10 (which isn't affected) uses 1.8.4-5. --- ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./casper/filesystem.squashfs CasperMD5CheckResult: fail CasperVersion: 1.445 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423) NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair Package: apt 2.0.2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-26.30-generic 5.4.30 Tags: focal Uname: Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: _MarkForUpload: True To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1890006/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
