Public bug reported: "ufw status numbered" shows all the rules in one block, numbered from top to bottom. First are the ipv4 rules, then the ipv6. This has led to some irritation.
A user asked how to add a IPv4 rule to the end of the list. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+question/692096 Inserting ipv6 rules to the correct position is not easy to understand https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1368411 My suggestion is to at least add some separator between the ipv4 and ipv6 rules in the output of "ufw status". A blank line, or a comment line (# IPv6 rules:) would be fine. This would indicate that not both rule lists, but only one of them, is applied to a connection. ## output suggestion: Status: active To Action From -- ------ ---- [ 1] 22/tcp ALLOW IN Anywhere [ 2] 8080:8090/tcp ALLOW IN Anywhere # mywww [ 3] WWW Full ALLOW IN Anywhere # IPv6 rules: [ 4] 22/tcp (v6) ALLOW IN Anywhere (v6) [ 5] 8080:8090/tcp (v6) ALLOW IN Anywhere (v6) # mywww [ 6] WWW Full (v6) ALLOW IN Anywhere (v6) ## system info ufw --version: ufw 0.35 #### side note But maybe this is irrelevant as long as the future plans of ufw are unclear. (https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+question/692803) ** Affects: ufw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898696 Title: add some deliminiter between ipv4 and ipv6 in ufw status Status in ufw package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: "ufw status numbered" shows all the rules in one block, numbered from top to bottom. First are the ipv4 rules, then the ipv6. This has led to some irritation. A user asked how to add a IPv4 rule to the end of the list. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+question/692096 Inserting ipv6 rules to the correct position is not easy to understand https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1368411 My suggestion is to at least add some separator between the ipv4 and ipv6 rules in the output of "ufw status". A blank line, or a comment line (# IPv6 rules:) would be fine. This would indicate that not both rule lists, but only one of them, is applied to a connection. ## output suggestion: Status: active To Action From -- ------ ---- [ 1] 22/tcp ALLOW IN Anywhere [ 2] 8080:8090/tcp ALLOW IN Anywhere # mywww [ 3] WWW Full ALLOW IN Anywhere # IPv6 rules: [ 4] 22/tcp (v6) ALLOW IN Anywhere (v6) [ 5] 8080:8090/tcp (v6) ALLOW IN Anywhere (v6) # mywww [ 6] WWW Full (v6) ALLOW IN Anywhere (v6) ## system info ufw --version: ufw 0.35 #### side note But maybe this is irrelevant as long as the future plans of ufw are unclear. (https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+question/692803) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1898696/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
