The attachment "debdiff for util-linux on Jammy" seems to be a debdiff.
The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that
they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff.  If the attachment
isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment,
remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors,
unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961542

Title:
  libsmartcols: Revert back to previous behaviour of non-shell parsable
  column output (lsblk -P)

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in util-linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  util-linux 2.37 in Jammy has introduced some new behaviour for lsblk
  and similar tools which depend on libsmartcols. This switched the -P /
  --pairs parameter from printing column names as normal, to changing
  the names to shell compatible names instead.

  e.g. lsblk -P now outputs LOG_SEC instead of LOG-SEC.

  The change broke some core tooling which rely on on the output of
  lsblk -P, most notably, curtin and MAAS, but I am sure there will be
  more applications affected.

  Affected MAAS users will see the following traceback when attempting
  to deploy 22.04:

  Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/curtin/curtin/block/__init__.py", line 785, in get_blockdev_sector_size
      logical = info[parent]['LOG-SEC']
  KeyError: 'LOG-SEC'
  'LOG-SEC'
  curtin: Installation failed with exception: Unexpected error while running 

  This is documented in MAAS bug 1956613.

  MAAS decided to fix it by changing from -P to -J, in the following commit:
  
https://git.launchpad.net/maas/commit/?id=e2c01963430e6837198a54bc1eadf3efc9fdd9a2

  Curtin now checks for MAJ_MIN, and changes it back to MAJ:MIN in:
  
https://github.com/canonical/curtin/commit/ce811db127fe1ce46498b83615f8faed8c7dfeb6

  The issue is that these commits are not tagged to any MAAS release,
  and users would be forced to upgrade MAAS to the latest stable release
  when available if they want to deploy 22.04.

  There are many users out there that don't want to upgrade MAAS, so
  returning to the previous column output is the most desirable
  solution.

  [Testcase]

  On a Jammy install, simply run lsblk with either -P or --pairs:

  $ sudo lsblk -P
  ...
  NAME="sda" MAJ_MIN="8:0" RM="0" SIZE="465.8G" RO="0" TYPE="disk" 
MOUNTPOINTS=""
  ...

  Affected installs will see MAJ_MIN.

  There is a test package available in the following ppa:

  https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/sf326660-test

  If you install it, you will see MAJ:MIN, just like it is on Impish and
  previous.

  [Where problems could occur]

  We are changing the column output for -P and --pairs for the following
  applications:

  * lsblk
  * findmnt
  * lsipc

  If any application has been modified to depend on the new column
  output, it will break. I don't have any examples of something that
  will break, because MAAS and curtin were modified such that they would
  be compatible with both column name formats.

  It should be noted that the manpage documents that lsblk output can
  change at any time:

  > The default output, as well as the default output from options like --fs 
and --topology, is subject to change. 
  > So whenever possible, you should avoid using default outputs in your 
scripts. 
  > Always explicitly define expected columns by using --output columns-list 
and --list in environments where a stable output is required.

  If a regression should occur, we will need to fix up these affected
  packages also.

  [Other info]

  The change came about when a user asked upstream to make -P / --pairs
  shell parsable, in Issue 1201 upstream:

  https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1201

  Karel Zak obliged, and it was implemented in the following commit:

  commit 58b510e5805d8350c31bfb81a47bcd38ea9fdd7e
  From: Karel Zak <k...@redhat.com>
  Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:14:10 +0100
  Subject: libsmartcols: sanitize variable names on export output
  Link: 
https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/commit/58b510e5805d8350c31bfb81a47bcd38ea9fdd7e

  I wrote to Karel Zak with the regressions introduced by changing the
  format, and asked to revert back, and instead implement the shell
  parsable logic as a new parameter.

  This happened in upstream issue 1594:

  https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1594

  Karel Zak was happy to oblige again, and we now have the following
  commits:

  338ad4a93 findmnt: commit missing flag
  0f843ab64 lsblk: update --help output for -y
  eba05f308 lsipc: add -y,--shell
  152c17aa4 findmnt: add -y,--shell
  9c7e81ff1 lslogins: add -y,--shell
  25fb0638a lsblk: add -y/--shell
  39679ea0c lsfd: use new libsmartcols functions
  6fd0e3590 column: use new libsmartcols functions
  0b3c2e80d include/carefulputc: remove unused function
  3b5db50f7 libsmartcols: change "export" behavior, add "shellvar" flag

  While we got the intended behaviour, these commits won't land until
  util-linux 2.38, which will be after Jammy releases, and the other
  issue is that this changes a significant amount of code, like nearly
  1k lines, and is spread over 10+ commits.

  I wrote to ubuntu-devel asking for advice, on either 1) not changing
  anything 2) backporting the 10+ new commits, or 3) simply reverting
  the commit which changed the behaviour.

  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
  devel/2022-February/041870.html

  ubuntu-devel had strong support for option (3).

  Hence, we will revert the below commit to ensure Jammy can be deployed on all 
existing MAAS releases.
  58b510e580 libsmartcols: sanitize variable names on export output

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1961542/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to