Sure! Here is a quick test using a veth pair and dnsmasq: ip link add veth0 up type veth peer name veth1 ip addr add 172.20.0.1/24 dev veth0 cat > /etc/netplan/60-veth1.yaml <<EOF network: version: 2 ethernets: veth1: dhcp4: true EOF dnsmasq -kq -C /dev/null -z -i veth0 -I lo -F 172.20.0.10,172.20.0.150 -O option:classless-static-route,169.254.0.0/24,0.0.0.0,169.254.1.0/24,172.20.0.2 & netplan apply
Here is the resulting routing table on Jammy: root@jammy:~# ip route default via 10.199.96.88 dev ens2 proto dhcp src 10.199.96.89 metric 100 10.199.96.88 dev ens2 proto dhcp scope link src 10.199.96.89 metric 100 10.199.96.88/31 dev ens2 proto kernel scope link src 10.199.96.89 metric 100 169.254.1.0/24 via 172.20.0.2 dev veth1 proto dhcp src 172.20.0.52 metric 100 172.20.0.0/24 dev veth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.20.0.1 172.20.0.0/24 dev veth1 proto kernel scope link src 172.20.0.52 metric 100 172.20.0.1 dev veth1 proto dhcp scope link src 172.20.0.52 metric 100 172.20.0.2 dev veth1 proto dhcp scope link src 172.20.0.52 metric 100 As you can see, the route to 169.254.0.0/24 is missing. If I run the same on Focal, I get the following routing table: root@focal:~# ip route default via 10.76.140.48 dev ens2 proto dhcp src 10.76.140.49 metric 100 10.76.140.48 dev ens2 proto dhcp scope link src 10.76.140.49 metric 100 10.76.140.48/31 dev ens2 proto kernel scope link src 10.76.140.49 169.254.0.0/24 dev veth1 proto dhcp scope link src 172.20.0.53 metric 100 169.254.1.0/24 via 172.20.0.2 dev veth1 proto dhcp src 172.20.0.53 metric 100 172.20.0.0/24 dev veth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.20.0.1 172.20.0.0/24 dev veth1 proto kernel scope link src 172.20.0.53 Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004478 Title: systemd-networkd's dhcp4 client ignores local subnet routes Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: RFC3442 specifies option 121 (Classless Static Routes) that allow a DHCP server to push arbitrary routes to a client. It has a Local Subnet Routes section expliciting the behavior of routes with a null (0.0.0.0) gateway. Such routes are to be installed on the interface with a Link scope, to mark them as directly available on the link without any gateway. Networkd currently drops those routes, which is against the RFC, as Linux has proper support for such routes. This has been observed as broken on Ubuntu Jammy 22.04 LTS, but working in previous LTS (Focall 20.04 and Bionic 18.04 tested). 1. Ubuntu release: 22.04.1 LTS 2. Systemd release: 249.11-0ubuntu3.6 3. Expected behavior: routes from DHCP option 121 with a gateway set to 0.0.0.0 to be installed as "scope link" 4. Observed behavior: routes are silently dropped by systemd-networkd's dhcp client (actually logged with a debug level, effectively silently with the default configuration) I wrote a fix that has been accepted in upstream systemd: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26234, which applies cleanly to the current package's sources obtained through apt-get source. As this is a fix for something that is an actual regression, can it be backported to Ubuntu 22.04's systemd tree? Thanks. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2004478/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp