** Description changed: [Impact] - When running "lscpu" on a Grace-based system + Ubuntu 22.04, it doesn't report a model name: + + When running "lscpu" on a Grace-based system + Ubuntu 22.04, it doesn't + report a model name: Vendor ID: ARM Model: 0 [Fix] - Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the problem. The commit below adds the specific codes missing from Jammy's version. + + Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the + problem. The commit below adds the specific codes missing from Jammy's + version. https://github.com/util-linux/util- linux/commit/6857cccbb4157d5da34ca98f77a0ac9d68e1e740 - [Evidence] - When upstream code is compiled, output of lscpu is correctly displayed: + [Test Steps] + + * Verify whether output of lscpu is correct on new CPUs; eg: Vendor ID: ARM Model name: Neoverse-V2 + * Verify whether output of lscpu doesn't change on old CPUs; eg: + Vendor ID: ARM + Model name: Neoverse-N1 + [What Could Go Wrong] - The fix does not apply directly to Jammy's version, as other commits change sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c. The suggestion is only to add the missing arm_part to the list. + + The fix only introduces additional model identifiers to match + against and print a model name string, thus regression impact + should be contained within lscpu and printing cpus model name + on ARM systems. + + Output doesn't change on systems with non-affected CPU models.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019856 Title: Add missing ARM-cores to support Grace-based systems Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in util-linux source package in Jammy: In Progress Status in util-linux source package in Kinetic: Won't Fix Status in util-linux source package in Lunar: In Progress Status in util-linux source package in Mantic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] When running "lscpu" on a Grace-based system + Ubuntu 22.04, it doesn't report a model name: Vendor ID: ARM Model: 0 [Fix] Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the problem. The commit below adds the specific codes missing from Jammy's version. https://github.com/util-linux/util- linux/commit/6857cccbb4157d5da34ca98f77a0ac9d68e1e740 [Test Steps] * Verify whether output of lscpu is correct on new CPUs; eg: Vendor ID: ARM Model name: Neoverse-V2 * Verify whether output of lscpu doesn't change on old CPUs; eg: Vendor ID: ARM Model name: Neoverse-N1 [What Could Go Wrong] The fix only introduces additional model identifiers to match against and print a model name string, thus regression impact should be contained within lscpu and printing cpus model name on ARM systems. Output doesn't change on systems with non-affected CPU models. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2019856/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
