To clarify, I mean that the existing dh_apparmor needs to be passed the
profile name and potentially the package name as well as it has no means
currently of discerning what those might be, which means there's no
current way to get around requiring the packager to manually add the
dh_apparmor call to the override_dh_install: target.
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1435452
Title:
dh_apparmor has no dh sequencer support
Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
As dh_apparmor timing is critical (it must run before services are
started with dh_installinit), it makes sense to provide direct dh
sequencer support so that maintainers don't have to remember to run it
directly, and cannot mistakenly call it at the wrong point, as
happened with MySQL in bug 1421303).
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1435452/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
