Hello Timo, or anyone else affected, Accepted eglibc into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/2.15-0ubuntu10.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Precise) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057526 Title: getaddrinfo returns PTR name in ai_canonname when using DNS Status in Embedded GLIBC: Fix Released Status in eglibc package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in eglibc source package in Precise: Fix Committed Status in eglibc package in Debian: Fix Released Status in eglibc package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Got pinged about this, not fixed in 12.04 yet. From the Redhat bug: "We have verified that getaddrinfo() does reverse address calls to DNS when AI_CANONNAME is passed in hints.ai_flags and returns the PTR name of the forward resolved ip address as Canonical name. The canonical name is arguably not what is returned by the PTR record for various reasons. Aside the fact that PTR record are often not under control of the the same people that control the A name, A names can also be roundrobin names and return multiple addresses. Picking one and returnings its PTR as canonical name seem highly questionable. A CNAME -> A name resolution is welcome as the A name is arguably the Canonical name of a CNAME. But getaddrinfo shouldn't do PTR requests to the DNS. We found this when testing ssh+GSSAPI auth on laptops that can properly set the A record for their name usin dynamic DNS updates but cannot change the PTR record of whatever network they are currently travelling in. This breaks kerberos which needs the canonical (A record) name to construct the principal name used to request a ticket when rdns = false is set in krb5.conf and GSSAPITrustDNS is set to no in ssh (the default)." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eglibc/+bug/1057526/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp