Here is a criticism of RR HRx releases by the owner of a competing record label:
There are several companies that are distributing their tracks on DVD-R discs because the files are so large that making downloads out of them is impractical. I have analyzed a number of these files as well and am sorry to say that there is nothing above 35 kHz in any of them. Why bother with 176.4 samples per second when the resultant audio doesn't take advantage of the higher sample rate? It's true that higher sample rates also contribute to easier filtering in the D to A process. But why wouldn't the HF material that is produced by the instruments show up in these tracks? You'll have to decide for yourself the motivations of these other labels. http://www.itrax.com/Pages/ArticleDetails.php?aID=21&x=7&y=4 -- mortslim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mortslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11039 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74688
_______________________________________________ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
