jimbobvfr400 wrote: 
> 
> Its just a shame the same care can't be used when mastering for CD.
> 
> Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

good point. to be fair, I think there are plenty of good masters used
for CDs (and plenty of bad).  I think the 24/96 may sometimes have a
better mastering, because they were done much later than the original CD
or album, so newer technology, more care because the album is now a
"classic" etc. may make the newer mastering better. On the other hand,
many folks cherish older masterings because new masters have fallen prey
to the "loudness wars".

One example, the Fleetwood Mac CD of "Then Play On" has long been
regarded as a terrible CD in terms of sound quality as compared with
original album. A newly remastered version of the CD was released last
week that is much better quality (and restores original UK running
order, and includes the A/B sides of the single "oh well, pt1 and pt2). 
But it is 16/44.1, so I didn't have to resort to hires to simply get the
better version (which was nice).



*Location 1:* VortexBox Appliance 4TB (2.2) > LMS 7.7.2 > Transporter,
Touch, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet)
*Location 2:* VBA 3TB (2.2) > LMS 7.7.2 > Touch > Benchmark DAC I, Boom,
Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio)
*Office:* Win7(64) > LMS 7.8 > SqueezePlay
*Spares:* VBA 4TB, SB3, Touch (3), Radio (3), CONTROLLER
*Controllers:* iPhone4S (iPeng), iPad2 (iPengHD & SqueezePad),
CONTROLLER, or SqueezePlay 7.7 on Win7(64) laptop
Ripping (FLAC) - dbpoweramp, Tagging - mp3tag, Spotify
------------------------------------------------------------------------
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99460

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to