Stratmangler wrote: > AIFF can be thought of as being WAV with knobs on. > WAV capable of carrying metadata, something that WAV itself has > difficulty with. > So the files are bigger from the off. > They're both PCM, and both have bandwidth hogging issues, which if not > met causes rebuffering. > > The reason why FLAC was settled on was because of greater efficiency WRT > network resources when streamed. > The OP needs to either work out some way of making fully wired the ways > things run, or turn off EDO and have 24/192 files resample to something > more efficient to stream.
Still doesn't answer the puzzle - what would cause one AIFF 192 file to always have rebuffering when similar (more than one) 192 AIFF file never have rebuffering - on the same system same network with no changes. EDO and bandwdith etc. is the same for all the files. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109917 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
