>From the toybox point of view, wouldn't this introduce direct link dependency on ssl/tls libraries?
If that's acceptable, the ktls stuff looks like a simple addition (on top of base in-toybox tls) with potential performance improvements, once the code settles down. On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote: > The kernel just merged "ssl renamed after thread local storage" support: > > vpaper: https://netdevconf.org/1.2/papers/ktls.pdf > sample code: https://github.com/ktls/af_ktls > > It's basic https plumbing in the kernel, but doesn't do the handshake or > renegotiation. What I'm wondering is would this be a better thing to try > to plug into than the openssl command line utility? > > Worth bothering with? > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > Toybox mailing list > Toybox@lists.landley.net > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net >
_______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
