On 12/16/2017 06:59 PM, enh wrote: > That's my point: there's no way to implement this correctly, so the > least worst choice is to just implement it the same as everyone else. > Whatever we do will be surprising in some instances, but "the same > surprises as the other systems" is at least manageable. I don't see how > anyone wins from toybox having a different but also broken heuristic.
Grumble grumble wanna decent spec. Sigh. I'm annoyed by having to read two different files to do one thing but if you feel strongly about it... I still need to fix the basename() stuff and add lots of tests. I'll try to get something checked in tomorrow. Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
